Business system. Before we go further into the discussion of
comparative business systems with the state of our beloved country giant
nippon, japan, less afdol it if we do not advance we equate perception
regarding the definition of the business itself, and also of course the
definition of a business system. A reputable sites, wikipedia defines
bahwasannya business is an organization that sells goods or services to
consumers or other businesses, to make a profit. While the
system is a procedure and mechanism of business services to customers in a
particular market.
Next, let's begin If we start talking about the business system prevailing in a country, of course it can not be ruled out is an analysis of the economic system of the country. Let us first consider the economic system that applied in Indonesia. Theoretically, Indonesia is a country that is implementing Pancasila economic system. Where we know in theory bahwasannya this economic system that limits the activity of private domination, as well as the brakes on the government's power over the economic activities of the people demikesejahteraan.
However, in practice, we can feel the existence of the ideology of liberalism that lately a lot of media buzzed with the nickname neolib. By not intend to perform sentiment against a party, it seems to neolib existence of cases of privatization of state-owned enterprises or the more often we hear as the privatization of state enterprises. Can we ama ... ti for example, the sale of shares by the government of Gresik cement in 1991 by 35% who continued also in 1998, then the sale of the shares of PT Indosat by 35% in 1994 and then eventually sold to the private sector in total , 2002. And when measured on average, most of which was privatized SOEs increased considerably compared to when management is done by the state. Although privatization is done by the reduction of the burden of the country's economic restructuring danusaha countries, has led to a negative public sentiment that certainly we have seen the emergence of the notion that "any company that is managed by the state tend to lose".
From here, we can draw an important fact bahwasannya governance or business system run by the government on SOEs considered less effective. The big question is, where is the business system errors? Or with more specific language, what causes the less-developed SOE governance? Let us try to solve these problems by analyzing successful business strategy Japan, for example Japan Inc. cooperation.
Japan. Sunrise this country adopts economic system of capitalism since the Meiji era. And Japan, have experienced an event known as the "Japanese economic miracle" associated rapid economic growth in the period around the 1960s hingga1980's. Even in the period of 1980s Japan experienced a golden age of automotive and electronics-related exports to Europe and America.
One business strategy that is considered as the main factor deciding the success of a business, especially in some Japanese companies overseas is the keiretsu. Keiretsu is a partnership strategy between several major companies in Japan. Among the best known is Japan Inc.. which is a collaboration between Japanese companies led by six major Japanese companies including Mitsubishi, Mitsui, Dai-chi Kangyo, Sumitomi, Sanwa and Fuyo. This cooperation takes the form of a business network that is very robust in terms of the company's operations, procurement of raw materials, funding, and distribution and marketing. And this cooperation has been proven to empower thousands of companies from various sectors in Japan.
If only the effectiveness of the application of the Keiretsu system implemented in Indonesia with SOE as a locomotive, the SOE can be well organized and almost certainly able to empower many companies from various sectors. While it previously in Indonesia had formed a large corporation with the name of Indonesia Inc.. However unfortunate it only becomes bahwasannya corporate buildings vulnerable by the crisis, and in addition it is advantageous formation was only a small part of groups and marginalized groups, including the majority of small businesses. In other words impressed that Indonesia Inc.. only be economic monopoly institution established on the basis of forced togetherness and is unfair. Thus the formation of SOE Inc.. expected not to repeat the same mistakes as in the formation of Indonesia Inc..
It should be noted that prior to the realization of SOE Inc.. is how the SOE restructuring efforts. Of course other than privatization measures which as we know have problems with the concept of nationalism. What you can do is attempt to create SOE tight as corporate body or an independent company (not ridden political interests), the creation of good corporate government, and the absence of abuse of authority. In other words, the state must change from a bureaucratic organization into a professional corporate institutions, and of course we hope will be a world-class company like Petronas in Malaysia.
Thus, Keiretsu business system that has proven its effectiveness to form a world-class effort in Japan, when the later has been applied in Indonesia, of course we hope we were able to change the face of state-owned enterprises become not only government agency that just let themselves into dairy cows to diverse political interests. However it is time-oriented into a formidable corporation that does not always end up on the privatization.
Next, let's begin If we start talking about the business system prevailing in a country, of course it can not be ruled out is an analysis of the economic system of the country. Let us first consider the economic system that applied in Indonesia. Theoretically, Indonesia is a country that is implementing Pancasila economic system. Where we know in theory bahwasannya this economic system that limits the activity of private domination, as well as the brakes on the government's power over the economic activities of the people demikesejahteraan.
However, in practice, we can feel the existence of the ideology of liberalism that lately a lot of media buzzed with the nickname neolib. By not intend to perform sentiment against a party, it seems to neolib existence of cases of privatization of state-owned enterprises or the more often we hear as the privatization of state enterprises. Can we ama ... ti for example, the sale of shares by the government of Gresik cement in 1991 by 35% who continued also in 1998, then the sale of the shares of PT Indosat by 35% in 1994 and then eventually sold to the private sector in total , 2002. And when measured on average, most of which was privatized SOEs increased considerably compared to when management is done by the state. Although privatization is done by the reduction of the burden of the country's economic restructuring danusaha countries, has led to a negative public sentiment that certainly we have seen the emergence of the notion that "any company that is managed by the state tend to lose".
From here, we can draw an important fact bahwasannya governance or business system run by the government on SOEs considered less effective. The big question is, where is the business system errors? Or with more specific language, what causes the less-developed SOE governance? Let us try to solve these problems by analyzing successful business strategy Japan, for example Japan Inc. cooperation.
Japan. Sunrise this country adopts economic system of capitalism since the Meiji era. And Japan, have experienced an event known as the "Japanese economic miracle" associated rapid economic growth in the period around the 1960s hingga1980's. Even in the period of 1980s Japan experienced a golden age of automotive and electronics-related exports to Europe and America.
One business strategy that is considered as the main factor deciding the success of a business, especially in some Japanese companies overseas is the keiretsu. Keiretsu is a partnership strategy between several major companies in Japan. Among the best known is Japan Inc.. which is a collaboration between Japanese companies led by six major Japanese companies including Mitsubishi, Mitsui, Dai-chi Kangyo, Sumitomi, Sanwa and Fuyo. This cooperation takes the form of a business network that is very robust in terms of the company's operations, procurement of raw materials, funding, and distribution and marketing. And this cooperation has been proven to empower thousands of companies from various sectors in Japan.
If only the effectiveness of the application of the Keiretsu system implemented in Indonesia with SOE as a locomotive, the SOE can be well organized and almost certainly able to empower many companies from various sectors. While it previously in Indonesia had formed a large corporation with the name of Indonesia Inc.. However unfortunate it only becomes bahwasannya corporate buildings vulnerable by the crisis, and in addition it is advantageous formation was only a small part of groups and marginalized groups, including the majority of small businesses. In other words impressed that Indonesia Inc.. only be economic monopoly institution established on the basis of forced togetherness and is unfair. Thus the formation of SOE Inc.. expected not to repeat the same mistakes as in the formation of Indonesia Inc..
It should be noted that prior to the realization of SOE Inc.. is how the SOE restructuring efforts. Of course other than privatization measures which as we know have problems with the concept of nationalism. What you can do is attempt to create SOE tight as corporate body or an independent company (not ridden political interests), the creation of good corporate government, and the absence of abuse of authority. In other words, the state must change from a bureaucratic organization into a professional corporate institutions, and of course we hope will be a world-class company like Petronas in Malaysia.
Thus, Keiretsu business system that has proven its effectiveness to form a world-class effort in Japan, when the later has been applied in Indonesia, of course we hope we were able to change the face of state-owned enterprises become not only government agency that just let themselves into dairy cows to diverse political interests. However it is time-oriented into a formidable corporation that does not always end up on the privatization.
